And may I suggest, Billy, you've got it too.
All the best
Paul London SW9
Spot on. If we gave out prizes this contribution would get one.
One argument runs : Punk made non-musicianship acceptable to a point where two generations of real players got accused of lacking "attitude". Another argument goes: Punk released an energy seen lacking in the turgid, over-produced and bombastic pop earlier in the seventies, took rock-and-roll back to it's fifties roots, and attacked the multi-national "business" to a point where they were only saved amid the multi-ironies of Live Aid. The third argument I also subscribe to, is that Punk Rock finally gave schoolkids an excuse to beat each other up, swear, spit, and even wear a school tie in a bizarre and rakish manner, and as such were every bit as liberating as Napoleon the Fourteenth or Sparky's Magic Piano.
Richard Russell London SE18
Typical narrow-minded snobbish middle-class well-educated bollocks. I remember you from Bromley. You didn't have the guts to try anything new - just sitting in your cellar playing 'blues.' Just because you're anti-social doesn't give you the right to criticise those who know how to have fun.
Johnny Armoury London W1
Too right Mr.J. Look at the pathetic attempt by punk svengali Malcolm Maclaren to solicite publicity by 'running for Mayor.' Ten grand for some good PR. Excellent value for money. It was nothing else. Shabby, empty and ultimately pointless - albeit a bit entertaining.
Mary Martin Lincoln
The anyone-can-do-it ethic is alive and well on the net - thousands of the buggers.
back to punk debate